For example...
I know quality trumps quantity...or at least it should. Theoretically. So, I should make the miles I run count, not just run miles and count them. Clearly. But I do get a sense of joy from entering digits into that running log of mine and exercising some math skills in adding them up.
Does quantity convey a sense of accomplishment better than quality?
Or is it just more fun and tangible to measure things by the numbers?
While we're on this topic...I also have a thing for round numbers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1803/e1803cf1463eabd1b5ccb425d69c9434a7561eb8" alt=""
If I was doing the whole listening to my body thing, which I always tell other people to do...I would be content having run what I have and calling it a day.
Listening to one's own advice is obviously overrated.
And inevitably, numbers grow to define a runner. Say you just completed a marathon (yes, I actually consider 26.2 a round number of miles). You tell people, because obviously you're super proud. It won't be long until someone asks what your time was. Even if it's a non-runner with no appreciation for how long 26.2 miles can be. And all of a sudden, how fast you ran starts to define the experience...or maybe, at least on some level, it always has?
Running really breeds a love for numbers, doesn't it?!
Haha I do round number running too - also works with time. Obviously there is a massive difference between running for 27 minutes and running for 30.
ReplyDelete